Tag: Jobbing

  • Letterpress Junction

    Letterpress Junction

    A great write-up by Justin Fen­ner of a new ven­ture by Ed Den­o­van — Let­ter­press Junc­tion — pro­vid­ing job­bing let­ter­press print­ing to design­ers.

    Best wish­es, Ed!

  • Gary Arber, Printer

    Gary Arber, Printer

    Let­ter­press-only print­ers are becom­ing increas­ingly dif­fi­cult to find.  Where this was once the only way to print and each town could boast of such a works, I have only seen a hand­ful in my let­ter­press adven­tures across the UK.  In York­shire, I saw the final days of Ken McWhan’s in Scar­bor­ough and saw the demise of Paul Mitchell of Fars­ley near Leeds.  The exem­plar blog for me is Spit­al­fields Life, and I was thrilled to see the Gen­tle Author pay a vis­it to Gary Arber on Roman Road in East Lon­don.

    I was less pleased when I saw that Mr Arber’s Print­ing Works was near clos­ure, so I took the chance to vis­it him.  I can’t do the same jus­tice as the Gen­tle Author to this won­der­ful sto­ry, fron­ted by Mr Arber, but I can as the ques­tions that I sus­pect print­ers would want me to ask, and also offer my best wish­es for his future.

    I spoke to Gary on Wed­nes­day 19 Feb­ru­ary and asked whether I could vis­it.  Some print­ers are almost furt­ive but Gary said he would wel­come a vis­it.  I made the short jour­ney from the bow­els of the City of Lon­don on the Num­ber 8 to this dif­fer­ent world.  The fact that the light above the door states Print­ing Works” leaves the dis­tinct impres­sion he means busi­ness.

    The visitor’s first impres­sion is the wealth of objects — every­where.  Each sur­face is filled with enga­ging and inter­est­ing things.  Sta­tion­ery, eph­em­era, odds-and-sods from the print works itself.  This ground floor is Arber’s shop win­dow and the place to deal with cus­tom­ers.  Gary was help­ful to the trick­le of cus­tom­ers that still attend in hope of solv­ing some com­mu­nic­a­tion need — des­pite the rather dra­conian park­ing restric­tions.

    Machine Room

    I was escor­ted down the small, steep stairs to the base­ment.  It’s here that the machines live that print­ers will have sal­iv­ated over in the Spit­al­fields Life art­icle.  The usu­al print­ing smells of oil and ink are here, but also the cold slight­ly damp air and qui­et that comes with being below street lev­el.  I could see that work has begun to remove these machines to Nor­folk and the renewed care of the Cat­seye Press, but the bulk of the bat­tery was here.

    Work­ing from under the stairs, the room con­tains the now-famous Lagon­da, the Heidel­berg Plat­en, a Superm­atic’, Wharfedale, Mer­cedes Glock­ner, and a small Gold­ing Press.

    De­cid­ing on Machines

    I asked Gary how he decid­ed on which machine to use for a job and his response was sim­ple: tiny jobs like busi­ness cards would be done on the Gold­ing; lar­ger jobs on the Heidel­berg and the largest jobs on the Wharfedale.

    The Lagonda’

    The Lagon­da has attrac­ted a lot of atten­tion — it’s one of those machines that few peo­ple have seen and had attained an almost myth­ical sta­tus.  The machine was installed in the 1950s, while Gary was in the Roy­al Air Force, but was nev­er very pop­u­lar.  The feed mech­an­ism is dri­ven by a long, sin­gle bar run­ning from left to right and this was tempre­mental.  An impres­sion of the last job remains on the tym­pan — a bot­tle label for oil — and the machine was last used around 1968.  The Brit­ish Print­er write-up of the Lagon­da sug­ges­ted they could be run side-by-side, but the way the motor hous­ing is posi­tioned leads me to believe that this could nev­er have been done in prac­tice.

    The Heidel­berg

    With the excep­tion of Steve Fish­er (who raves about the Thomp­son Plat­en), the ranks of com­mer­cial job­bing let­ter­press print­ers fall in love with their Heidel­bergs and Gary is no excep­tion.  This machine is his go to’ machine and has been used until the last two weeks.

    Gold­ing and Wharfedale

    These two machines are fam­ous from their con­nec­tion with the suf­fra­gettes.   It’s these two machines used to print for the cam­paign.  I was espe­cially tak­en with the size of the Wharfedale (Crown sized: 20? x 30?) — such small machines are unusu­al accord­ing to Bri­an Aldred.

    Case or Composing Room

    The stairs adja­cent to the front door lead upstairs to the com­pos­ing room.  Three men worked here at one time: each with his own stand of cas­es.  The room looks slight­ly domes­tic with red and gold wall­pa­per but this is what the comps liked, said Gary.  It looks rather chaot­ic, and I sup­pose that the demands of work over time meant that very lit­tle type seems to have been returned to its case.

    Type Selec­tion

    Gary told me that his sup­plier of choice was Risca­type, of Mon­mouth­shire.  He con­cen­trated on Gill for the sans face and Times for the ser­iffed face.  A small run of Rock­well and Per­petua sup­ple­ments this.

    Gen­eral Lay­out of the Works

    The works was at one time all based in the base­ment machine room: with case racks and com­pos­it­ors work­ing along the back wall and machines on the out­side wall.  As the busi­ness expan­ded, the guil­lot­ine and case racks were moved to a shed in the back yard.  From there they were moved to the back of the shop’ area on the ground floor.  Even­tu­ally the case room was moved upstairs in to what was the liv­ing area.  Gary told me that a Factor­ies Inspec­tor in the 1970s had sug­ges­ted the works was not up to stand­ard: includ­ing the need to guard most use­ful ele­ments of the machine, replace the stair­case to the cel­lar and white­wash the case room.  Gary declined and end­ed up let­ting go of his staff to avoid fur­ther enforce­ment by the Inspec­tor.  The case room, by the way, retains the ori­ginal wall­pa­per!

    The Future

    Gary Arber in the Case­room

    Gary’s works have been pro­du­cing prin­ted mater­ial since 1897 and the won­der­ful human sto­ry that fol­lows this is best told by the Gen­tle Author.  It was a pleas­ure to meet Mr Arber and to find him so will­ing to indulge my hob­by printer’s curi­os­it­ies.  Gary’s machines each have a new home pen­cilled in, and I wish the chaps at Cat­seye Press the very best with dimant­ling, mov­ing, restor­ing and oper­at­ing these frag­ments of a mosa­ic that cov­er print­ing, the East End, the Suf­fra­gettes and Mr Arber him­self.

    I did ask whether I might indulge him with some­thing for his hos­pit­al­ity, but Gary — it seems — has no vices!

    Best wish­es, Gary, for the next chap­ter of life away from your Print­ing Works.

    Update: April 2014

    The nice chaps from the Cat­s­eye Press have been in touch with me –

    Once we have it installed and cleaned (quite a lot) We will be more than hap­py for peo­ple with an inter­est to vis­it our Lagon­da Plat­en (as removed from Arber’s in Roman Road) Along with our exten­sive col­lec­tion of oth­er plat­en and cylin­der machines.

  • Letterpress in Mogadishu

    An arti­cle in The Atlantic about a print­ing works in Soma­li­a’s cap­i­tal.  Great ephemer­al print­ing in very try­ing con­di­tions on a Hei­del­berg Cylin­der Press.

  • History of the Jobbing Platen

    History of the Jobbing Platen

    After the 1830s, the growth of the postal ser­vice and the expan­sion of com­merce led to growth in demand for small, print­ed arti­cles.  The Job­bing Plat­en met this need for the print­er: being quick­er than the ear­li­er hand press­es; and more suit­ed to small work than cylin­der press­es. It’s tempt­ing to think that the plat­en press sim­ply appeared — ful­ly formed — but there were many small advances that made that style of press pos­si­ble. Daniel Tread­well, an Amer­i­can, sought an 1818 patent to pro­tect his design for a mod­i­fied hand press that used foot pow­er (like a trea­dle) to deliv­er the impres­sion.  He trans­ferred the inven­tion to Eng­land and the firm of Baisler and Napi­er made the machine at their works at Lloyds Court, Crown Street, Soho; but only one is report­ed to have been sold.  The rotat­ing ink disc was invent­ed between 1819 and 1820 by Sir William Con­gereve for secu­ri­ty print­ing.  John Kitchen of New­cas­tle Upon Tyne patent­ed the ver­ti­cal forme in 1834.  It seems the machine would not have been com­mer­cial­ly suc­cess­ful, but was designed in the style of goth­ic church fur­ni­ture”.

    The First Usable Platen

    Stephen Rug­gles, from Boston USA, devel­oped the Engine press in 1839 but the bed and plat­en were hor­i­zon­tal.  Despite this, the press claimed 1,200 impres­sions per hour.  It was his devel­op­ment of 1851 of the Card and Bill­head Press” that opened the era of the first usable plat­en: this relied on his strange ink­ing mech­a­nism.  The approach is to have a large cylin­der, flat on one side for the type.  The cylin­der is cov­ered in ink and as the rollers pass around it, they draw ink from the cir­cu­lar part of the cylin­der and deposit it on the forme.  This press was made in Britain by the Birm­ing­ham Machin­ist Com­pa­ny as the Invic­tus and also Fur­ni­val and Com­pa­ny of Red­dish.  The prin­ci­ple was lat­er adapt­ed by Adana for their T/P48.

    The Modern Platen

    The pro­to­type plat­en press was devel­oped by George Gor­don of New York.  His ear­ly press (1851) was named The Alli­ga­tor because of its rep­u­ta­tion of crush­ing limbs of those feed­ing the press.  This first ver­sion had a fixed ink­ing pan­el, it was 1856 before he added the rotat­ing ink­ing disc.  In 1872, the throw off” was added: a mech­a­nism to allow the oper­a­tor to dis­able the impres­sion when a sheet had been mis-fed, for exam­ple.  Again, the idea was not new hav­ing been patent­ed in 1852 by James Young of Philadel­phia. Crop­per of Not­ting­ham began to make Gor­don’s press­es under the name Min­er­va, but the term Crop­per to define that type of press became com­mon­place.  Oth­er, local­ly designed, press­es used Gor­don’s idea like the Arab from Hal­i­fax.

    The Parallel Platen

    Improv­ing on the clam shell” approach, Mer­rit Gal­ly of New York devel­oped a press in 1859 called the Uni­ver­sal which brought the bed and the plat­en togeth­er with a par­al­lel impres­sion.  This was improved by the Vic­to­ria and Phoenix press­es.  In the UK, Green­wood and Bat­ley of Leeds sold a very sim­i­lar press under the name Sun; Daw­son’s of Otley the Mitre; and Har­rild of Lon­don the Fine Art Brem­n­er.

    The Powered, Automatically-Fed Platen

    Know­ing that the effort of a boy could not be sus­tained to thou­sands of impres­sions each hour, work began on mak­ing effi­cien­cies of space and pow­er.  In 1893, Har­rild of Lon­don cre­at­ed a plat­en press run­ning back-to-back: two mov­ing platens each print­ing against a sin­gle, two-sided, fixed bed. With steam and elec­tric pow­er, the next chal­lenge was to feed the press with paper. A grip­per was patent­ed by God­frey in the 1880s, and an auto­mat­ed feed for US Chan­dler and Price press­es was being sold by 1913.  Per­haps most known to us in the UK is the inven­tion of Gilke, a Hei­del­berg Engi­neer, who cre­at­ed the wind­mill feed in 1912 which was incor­po­rat­ed in to the 1925 Hei­del­berg Auto­mat­ic Plat­en.

  • Platen Presses

    Platen Presses

    Plat­en press­es here include press­es pow­ered by foot, steam or elec­tric­i­ty. Their main char­ac­ter­is­tic is that paper is fed into a jaw’ with the type on one side and paper on the oth­er. Some have auto­mat­ic feeds, so that paper does­n’t have to be sup­plied by hand for each impres­sion.

    These machines formed the main­stay of job­bing print­ers let­tr­press work up to the 1980s, and are used today by print­ers for cut­ting, creas­ing and num­ber­ing.

    [wpv-view id=“151752”]