Tag: Typography

  • Medium: Designing the letter ​‘Æ’

    Medium: Designing the letter Æ’

    An account on Medi­um of design­ing the let­ter Æ.


    Head­er Image By Szom­jas­rágó at Hun­gar­i­an Wikipedia (Trans­ferred from hu.wikipedia to Com­mons.) [CC0], via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

  • The Fell Types

    Igi­no Marini’s web­site about the Fell Types, includ­ing down­load­able ver­sions of the types, via. Ian Knight.

  • Metal Type: Monotype Recorders

    Metal Type: Monotype Recorders

    An amaz­ing project by Dave Hugh­es and John Cor­nelisse to scan the back copies of the Mono­type Recorder.  The Mono­type Recorder both set the stan­dard and doc­u­ment­ed the advance of typog­ra­phy at the hands of this firm and these PDFs will make fas­ci­nat­ing read­ing.  Thanks, both!

  • James Mosley: ​‘Commercial at’ or @

    James Mosley: Commercial at’ or @

    Great­ly infor­ma­tive arti­cle on the his­to­ry of the com­mer­cial at’ or @ sym­bol by James Mosley.

  • Choosing Typefaces

    Choosing Typefaces

    In the let­ter­press world, the choice of type­faces was a very big con­sid­er­a­tion.  Remem­ber that today we can down­load new faces and use them imme­di­ate­ly.  In let­ter­press set­tling on one face meant a large out­lay and phys­i­cal space occu­pied by type­cas­es and lead type.  It was no sim­ple mat­ter to adopt a new house face once all that mon­ey had been spent.

    Print­ers sel­dom had the oppor­tu­ni­ty to start afresh so this arti­cle is some­what ide­al­is­tic, but all print­ers were encour­aged to have a sys­tem or a house approach to types.  This arti­cle is based on a Novem­ber 1957 arti­cle in Print in Britain, and is unusu­al because it was­n’t based on the self-inter­est of any one founder or com­pos­ing sup­pli­er (like Mono­type or Lino­type).  The arti­cle assumes a small­er print­ing works where there could not be an end­less sup­ply of space or cap­i­tal to spend on type.

    The first con­cern is around the class of work that the print­er would under­take and we can clas­si­fy our small print­er in to one of three groups –

    • Class A: All round small job­bing: com­mer­cial work, adverts, shops and trades­men’s print­ing
    • Class B: Pro­fes­sion­al-class job­bing: brochures, leaflets and more ambi­tious than Class A
    • Class C: Fur­ther devel­oped job­bing: an exten­sion of Class B that might include colour work or some books

    We also need to know whether the print­er has cho­sen to be a Mono­type house or a line-cast­ing house (using a Lino­type or an Inter­type).  The faces avail­able on each of these sys­tems was dif­fer­ent.

    The Monotype House

    Class A Printer

    The rec­om­men­da­tion here is that because Times New Roman (Mono­type Series 327) is so ubiq­ui­tous, it does need to be includ­ed but should not be first choice.  An old face design like Imprint (101) might take the top slot in 9, 11 and 12pt.  The Gill fam­i­ly (262) would come next con­sid­er­ing the many vari­ants that might be used with­in this fam­i­ly and the fact that it can be sup­ple­ment­ed with dis­play faces.  Start with 6, 8, 10 and 12pt.  Final­ly, Times New Roman should be bought in 8, 10 and 12pt with 6pt an option for small adver­tis­ing work.  The rule here (and for all oth­er faces) is to get ital­ic, then small caps, then bold if need­ed.

    Class B Printer

    The empha­sis here is on the pro­fes­sion­al approach and so the choice of faces changes slight­ly.  Know­ing that this work is to pro­duce more last­ing items (like brochures) rather than the throw-away cir­cu­lar the approach is a lit­tle more clas­sic.

    The rec­om­men­da­tion is to use Baskerville (169) instead of Imprint (in sizes 8, 10, 12pt).  Plan­tin (110) (in 8, 10 and 11pt) would be used in lieu of Times.  Plan­tin is rec­om­mend­ed because of its august’ appear­ance when well-lead­ed and its econ­o­my of space when need­ed.

    Gill is used again for the sans serif face.

    Class C Printer

    The Class C print­er will also need to be able to tack­le some book work, and we rec­om­mend Bem­bo (270) in 10, 12 and 14pt to sup­ple­ment the Class B list.  One word of cau­tion here, the ital­ics and small caps will be crit­i­cal in this work so need to be seen as inte­gral with the pur­chase of the roman.  Bold might be bought at a lat­er stage.  This print­er might also buy Times New Roman as a fifth choice.

    The Linotype or Intertype House

    With a slight­ly more lim­it­ed range of faces, there is per­haps less scope to dis­cuss the var­i­ous com­bi­na­tions.  One con­sid­er­a­tion is the faces to be duplexed that’s to say which two faces should appear on each matrix.  Some faces had no relat­ed bold so a bold from a sim­i­lar face had to be sup­plied.  For most work the ital­ic (rather than the bold) was best to be duplexed with the roman.

    Class A Printer

    • Times (with ital­ic and small caps) 8, 10, 12pt
    • Granjon (with ital­ic and small caps) 9, 11, 12pt
    • Metrob­lack No. 2 (per­haps with Metro­light No. 2) 6, 8, 10, 12pt

    Class B Printer

    This print­er would keep Metrob­lack as the sans serif but use some more tra­di­tion­al faces:

    • Granjon (with ital­ic and small caps) 8, 10, 12pt
    • Times New Roman (with ital­ic and small caps) 9, 10, 12pt
    • Plan­tin (with ital­ic and small caps) 8, 10, 11pt

    Class C Printer

    • Granjon (with ital­ic and small caps) 8, 10, 12pt
    • Plan­tin (with ital­ic and small caps) 8, 10, 11pt
    • Cale­do­nia (with ital­ic and small caps) 8, 10, 12pt

    With a fourth face of Pil­grim (10 and 12pt) and a fifth for book work of Min­er­va (8, 10, 12pt).

    Display Types

    Types larg­er than 14pt are classed as dis­play types and are usu­al­ly used for head­ings rather than body text.  The choic­es here expand depend­ing on the house.

    Monotype House

    The Class A print­er is rec­om­mend­ed to get the com­pan­ion dis­play sizes for his basic selec­tion: so Gill and Times in dis­play sizes.  Spread­ing fur­ther Head­line Bold (595) or Per­pet­ua Titling (258) might be used.

    The Class B print­er might use Alber­tus (481) and maybe Rock­well Bold (391).

    Print­ers in Class C will need Per­pet­ua for head­lines, chap­ter open­ings and dropped cap­i­tals in book work.

    For all of these groups, a use­ful script would be Klang (593); but this will need to be con­trast­ed with the rest of the piece.

    Linotype or Intertype House

    Again, we have the issue around a more lim­it­ed num­ber of faces.  Some faces also had vari­ants or sizes miss­ing in the series.  For the Class A print­er, Cen­tu­ry Bold, Metromedi­um and Granjon should be used, with Pab­st Extra Bold as a fourth choice.  Class B print­er should use Mem­phis Bold, Plan­tin and Times New Roman.  Print­er C should use Min­er­va Bold and Scotch Roman No. 2.

    Because line cast­ing hous­es typ­i­cal­ly includ­ed a Lud­low machine, Lud­low faces in sizes 36 to 72 should be reviewed: Tem­po Heavy, Bodoni Bold, Franklin Goth­ic, Caslon and Gara­mond are can­di­dates.

    Founders’ Types

    Regard­less of the house approach to type­set­ting, some more exot­ic types could be employed that have been bought from type­founders.  This list should be strict­ly lim­it­ed, though, con­sid­er­ing the expense and space that these less-used faces would need.

    From Stephen­son, Blake the rec­om­men­da­tions are: Grotesque No. 9 and ital­ic; Chis­el, Old Face Open and Franch­esca Ronde; along with an antique face like Con­sort (or Antiques No. 3 and No. 6 from Stevens, Shanks).

    Con­ti­nen­tal founders’ might sup­ply Mis­tral, Sap­phire Ini­tials, Stu­dio, Hol­la, Paris Weiss and Stop.

  • Ludlow Typography

    Ludlow Typography

    Ludlow Type Specimen Book
    Lud­low Type Spec­i­men Book

    From the 1920s, Mono­type took the chal­lenge of improv­ing typog­ra­phy very seri­ous­ly and embarked on a pro­gramme of devel­op­ing new faces and reviv­ing clas­sic faces so that the world might be rid of faces like Chel­tenham.  Inter­type and Lino­type were slow to fol­low and con­cen­trat­ed on speed of pro­duc­tion rather than qual­i­ty.  My view is that Lud­low took typog­ra­phy seri­ous­ly, but their small­er mar­ket share meant they did­n’t have the same impact.

    The sys­tem itself had some advan­tages as well as the ital­ics (men­tioned below), the same degree of con­trol was avail­able over spac­ing as in hand com­po­si­tion.  Con­trast this with linecast­ers using adjustable spaces that some­times led to rivers of spaces fol­low­ing through work.

    The name R. Hunter Mid­dle­ton is syn­ony­mous with the Lud­low Cor­po­ra­tion, and he designed some of the fir­m’s most suc­cess­ful faces includ­ing Depl­hi­an Titling, Tem­po (sans serif), Kar­nak (slab serif), and a Gara­mond

    Italics

    Ludlow Italic Matrices
    Lud­low Ital­ic Matri­ces

    Because of the sim­plic­i­ty of the Lud­low sys­tem, they could make amend­ments to the oper­a­tion of the machine rel­a­tive­ly eas­i­ly.  Once such change was to intro­duce ital­ic matri­ces, and a spe­cial ital­ic stick.  A dif­fi­cult prob­lem for line-cast­ing is that ital­ics have a ten­den­cy to encroach on the area of the pre­ced­ing and fol­low­ing let­ters: take the f for exam­ple, which will hang under the ear­li­er char­ac­ter and over the fol­low­ing.  Because most oth­er cast­ing uses rec­tan­gu­lar mats, this can­not eas­i­ly be account­ed for and so the face has to be adjust­ed and weak­ened to fit with­in the con­fines of the mat.  In 1913 Lud­low decid­ed to go with the ital­ic whole­heart­ed­ly and devel­oped matri­ces that slope at a 17° angle and are held in a stick with ends at the same angle.  The result is that an f, for exam­ple, can be cast at that angle and fit neat­ly with the oth­er types at the same angle.  By means of tri­an­gu­lar spaces, roman and ital­ics can mix on the same line.

    Lud­low took full advan­tage of this and devel­oped some beau­ti­ful ital­ics to go with their faces.

    Ruleform

    Know­ing that they were keen to attract the job­bing print­er, Lud­low set out to make the print­ing of ruled formes very easy.  Job­bing print­ers had to pro­duce invoic­es, bills, account sheets and so on, and tra­di­tion­al­ly had used met­al rules sat between lead types to cre­ate the right pat­tern.  This approach tied up mate­r­i­al and took a vast amount of time: imag­ine set­ting mul­ti­ple hor­i­zon­tal and ver­ti­cal rules with some type to cre­ate a petrol sta­tion receipt, for exam­ple.

    Mr Mer­rill of Lud­low devel­oped Rule­form in 1923.  The approach was to cre­ate uni­form-width matri­ces and exploit the slug by cast­ing over­hangs and under­hangs at the top and bot­tom of the same slug.  Using the repeat cast­ing func­tion meant that one line could be set and dupli­cat­ed, and the under­hangs and over­hangs would mesh with each oth­er to cre­ate a whole, sol­id lump for print­ing.

  • Stephenson, Blake

    Stephenson, Blake

    This arti­cle is about the tra­di­tion­al type-found­ing activ­i­ties of Stephen­son, Blake. In late 2005 Thomas Blake sold the orig­i­nal site and a new firm, Stephen­son and Blake Lim­it­ed, con­tin­ue the brass rule and oth­er brass prod­ucts from Eff­in­g­ham Road, Sheffield

    Stephenson, Blake Card Fount Catalogue
    Stephen­son, Blake Card Fount Cat­a­logue

    The now defunct, but still famous name of Stephen­son, Blake (SB) was cre­at­ed when James Blake and John Stephen­son signed a part­ner­ship agree­ment on 25 Sep­tem­ber 1830 to last until 1840. The agree­ment was renewed, and the name per­sist­ed, absorb­ing many oth­er type foundries in the inter­ven­ing years. The foundry had always been based around Upper Allen Street in Sheffield

    The foundry had been in Sheffield in one form or anoth­er since around 1797 when a local book­seller (John Slater) and a book­seller-print­er (William Bow­er) joined forces with a print­er (Clay Bacon) to cast type, issu­ing their first spec­i­men in 1809. That found­ing work had per­sist­ed under many names until tak­en on by Gar­nett and Blake, and then becom­ing Stephen­son, Blake.

    Since the ear­li­est times SB had worked to 1/5000th of an inch as a mat­ter of course: the type they found­ed was con­sid­ered the most pre­cise in the UK.

    A Lon­don ware­house was opened in 1865 to sup­ply the demands of Fleet Street news­pa­pers. Busi­ness was so good that they removed to larg­er Lon­don premis­es on Alder­s­gate Street in 1871.

    The next major change was the move to the Amer­i­can Point sys­tem which had been adopt­ed by Amer­i­ca in 1886. Some firms in the UK were quick to adopt this change-like Cax­ton in 1895-it was a fur­ther four years before SB renewed their moulds and matri­ces to work on the point sys­tem. A key advan­tage for cus­tomers was that type and spac­ing was now inter­change­able between sup­pli­ers: print­ers hav­ing a uni­form sys­tem to mea­sure size.

    A rival founder, Lon­don-based Charles Reed and Sons hit finan­cial dif­fi­cul­ties and was sold in 1905 to Stephen­son, Blake who offered £5,000 for the foundry, matri­ces and the 82 tons of stock. The pur­chase was effec­tive from 1 Jan­u­ary 1906 and the firm was known for a time as Stephen­son, Blake and Com­pa­ny and Sir Charles Reed and Sons’. The work of the Reed foundry and some equip­ment was shipped to Sheffield where an almost self-con­tained foundry exist­ed along­side the SB equip­ment.

    In Jan­u­ary 1907 a Wood­work­ing Depart­ment was estab­lished over the road from the foundry to make fur­ni­ture for com­pos­ing rooms and type cas­es. A year lat­er the pro­duc­tion of wood let­ter was brought in-house and exam­ples first appeared in the spec­i­men books of 1910.

    All type founders were affect­ed by the Great War of 19141918 and this led to fur­ther ratio­nal­i­sa­tion in the indus­try. Dis­cus­sions began with H W Caslon about an amal­ga­ma­tion, but this did not reach a suc­cess­ful con­clu­sion at this time. Caslon’s fac­to­ry had been used to man­u­fac­ture items need­ed for war, and this pro­vid­ed finan­cial help to take them out of the finan­cial prob­lems. Build­ing on this, Caslon issued a book­let called Two Cen­turies of Type Found­ing which the wider indus­try admired.

    Stephen­son, Blake react­ed by engag­ing Robert Fishen­den to pro­duce the most ambi­tious spec­i­men book ever devised. Sev­en hun­dred pages were hand-set in Lon­don, shipped to Stephen­son Blake and then to West Street where the printer‑J W Northend Ltd-had the task of tak­ing proofs. These were inspect­ed by H K Stephen­son and R G Blake before being com­mit­ted to print on two hand fed quad-demy Miehle machines. The qual­i­ty of the result was high­light­ed when the book was reviewed by the Times Edu­ca­tion­al Sup­ple­ment. J W Northend was told that SB would take their busi­ness else­where if they moved to mechan­i­cal com­po­si­tion, and Northend resist­ed this until the 1970s.

    In 1936 SBs main competitor‑H W Caslon-had again met finan­cial dif­fi­cul­ties and went in to vol­un­tary liq­ui­da­tion. Stephen­son, Blake bought the good­will, assets and punch­es of Caslon, and retained the name by call­ing their Sheffield premis­es The Caslon Let­ter Foundry.

    World War II had a great effect on the foundry: not only because many men were called up, but air raids dis­rupt­ed the busi­ness. In Decem­ber 1940 air raids meant that gas, elec­tric­i­ty and water were lost to the foundry in Sheffield. R G Blake had ensured that cast­ing machines were ready for work at his home, and these were used for cast­ing until mains ser­vices returned in Jan­u­ary 1942.

    Post 1950 the Wood­work­ing Depart­ment had expand­ed to pro­vide a full ser­vice to com­pos­ing rooms and many pres­ti­gious orders were exe­cut­ed includ­ing the Sun­day Times’ com­pos­ing room in 1973.

    Fol­low­ing the trends of the indus­try Stephen­son, Blake found it dif­fi­cult to remain a let­ter­press busi­ness in face of com­pe­ti­tion from litho machines. They diver­si­fied by offer­ing the Let­ter­phot’ sys­tem of pho­to type­set­ting; and turn­ing the wood oper­a­tions to the man­u­fac­ture of pre­ci­sion instru­ment cas­es. The fir­m’s pre­ci­sion engi­neer­ing team was used by Rolls-Royce Olym­pus to pro­duce moulds for parts for Con­corde.

    The firm found it dif­fi­cult to pay busi­ness rates on the sprawl­ing col­lec­tion of build­ings around Upper Allen street and began to divest them­selves of them, includ­ing knock­ing some down. Re-loca­tion was con­sid­ered to Der­byshire to avoid this over­head.

    Just before 2000 the firm sold its non-print­ing busi­ness­es and Thomas James Blake looked to re-launch the firm. For a time the firm remained pro­duc­ing relat­ed items for the non-print­ing mar­ket: brass rule for plas­tics firms; Mazak type for hot-foil­ing and cab­i­net mak­ing for muse­ums. The col­lec­tion of his­tor­i­cal matri­ces and punch­es went to the Type Muse­um in Lon­don with assis­tance from the Sci­ence Muse­um.

    By Decem­ber 2004 this final ele­ment of the busi­ness had ceased, although the fir­m’s web­site ran until March 2005. The site is cur­rent­ly being re-devel­oped with the his­tor­i­cal build­ing being turned to flats. The scheme will be called Impact after SBs 1965 face designed by Geof­frey Lee.

    Further Information

  • Type and Typography

    Type and Typography

    Let­ter­press print­ing depends on a raised image, it’s known as a relief pro­cess. Mov­able type was the break­through that allowed print­ers to use and re-use indi­vidual char­ac­ters. When you prac­tice let­ter­press print­ing it’s easy to for­get just how dif­fi­cult it must be for type founders to cre­ate tiny pieces of cast met­al hard enough to with­stand a tre­mend­ous force that are made to tol­er­ances of less than one thou­sandth of an inch.

    Guten­berg of Ger­many is cred­ited with the inven­tion of move­able type around 1450; but records show that both Chi­nese and Kore­an invent­ors had used the idea before the time. Gutenberg’s inven­tion was the first to be exploit­ed and the idea spread rap­idly. There are three key stages in found­ing type –

    • Punch­cut­ting: cre­at­ing a three-dimen­sion­al rep­res­ent­a­tion of the let­ter in the end of a bar of met­al. This skilled work requires a num­ber of oth­er punch­es and tools to be used to cre­ate the punch, and then it be sub­ject to harden­ing. Mod­ern-day equi­val­ents of punch­es can be seen in DIY stores to mark met­al equip­ment with ini­tials.
    • Cre­at­ing the Mat­rix: this step takes the punch, and strikes it in a soft­er met­al to make a neg­at­ive mould. The met­al is usu­ally brass
    • Cast­ing: this is fill­ing the mould with mol­ten type met­al and remov­ing the cast type

    Type Found­ing in the Print­ing Eco­nomy in the UK

    Type found­ing is a spe­cial­ist indus­try need­ing artis­tic and design skills in equal meas­ure with engin­eer­ing prowess and abil­ity to work in some of the very heavy aspects of indus­try. The indus­try was cen­tred around the demand in Fleet Street, Lon­don; but oth­er sig­ni­fic­ant type founders worked where tech­nical expert­ise was great­est-for exam­ple Steph­en­son, Blake of Shef­field.

    The key con­straint for print­ers was that type from a foundry had to be assem­bled by hand before print­ing could begin. This com­pos­i­tion activ­ity took a great deal of time and tied up cap­ital in the type need­ed. As the 19th cen­tury grew to a close peo­ple we very keen to auto­mate this part of the process-work began to look at pro­du­cing type in the order it was need­ed. That’s to say go dir­ectly from the copy to the met­al type with no sort­ing or com­pos­ing pro­cess in between.

    There became two fam­il­ies of type: foundry type (gen­er­ally hard­er qual­ity) that was pro­duced in the great foundries; and com­pos­i­tion type (slight­ly soft­er qual­ity) that was pro­duced from copy either by a spe­cial­ist firm, or even by the print­er him­self.

    UK Type Foundries

    The UK had a num­ber of very influ­en­tial foundries. While ear­ly met­al type from the con­tin­ent (in par­tic­u­lar Dutch type) was con­sidered super­ior, the UK caught up and great names like Caslon, Fig­gins and Steph­en­son, Blake were estab­lished. The large num­ber of small foundries gave way to a smal­ler num­ber of large foundries. The last of the Eng­lish Foundries, Steph­en­son, Blake of Shef­field stopped trad­ing in Decem­ber 2004. That foundry alone had acquired Charles Reed and Sons in 1905, and H. W. Caslon and Co in 1937.

    Com­pos­i­tion Type

    Allow­ing print­ers to cast their own type was a key dri­ver behind devel­op­ments in com­pos­i­tion type. There were two broad approach­es: build a com­plete line of type from a machine; or build indi­vidual char­ac­ters in the cor­rect order from the machine.

    Lino­type and Inter­type took a sim­ilar approach: the oper­ator sat at a key­board and typed the copy. While copy was being typed the matri­ces (type moulds) were assem­bled with­in the machine. Once a line was com­pleted the moulds were filled with hot type met­al and the res­ult­ing slug’ was forced from the machine, being trimmed and shaped in the pro­cess. The Lud­low Typo­graph was sim­ilar, but the matri­ces were assem­bled by hand.

    Mono­type adop­ted a dif­fer­ent tack. They split the oper­a­tion between key­ing the copy and cast­ing the type. Copy was typed on a Mono­type Key­board pow­ered by com­pressed air which punched holes in a paper tape. The tape was then tak­en to a cast­ing machine  which used the paper tape to pos­i­tion a case of matri­ces and cast a sin­gle piece of type for each key­stroke on the paper tape. The advant­age of this approach was to allow for cor­rec­tion after com­pos­i­tion had been pro­duced by the machine.

    In mod­ern times, Mono­type machines can be con­trolled by com­puter–allow­ing the dir­ect pro­duc­tion of met­al type from a com­puter key­board.

    Fur­ther Information