Tag: Paper Merchants

  • Machine or Grain Direction in Paper

    Machine or Grain Direction in Paper

    Paper Curling
    Paper Curl­ing

    You might have noticed that when you tear a square from a sheet of paper, one direc­tion leaves a nice clean edge but the edge is much more ragged on the right-angled tear.  You’ll have also spot­ted that when fold­ing A4 sheets in to A5 book­lets there’s a strong ten­den­cy that the book­let will spring open.  Paper dis­plays dif­fer­ent qual­i­ties depend­ing on whether you’re work­ing in the direc­tion of the ​‘grain’ or ​‘across the grain’.

    Because paper is made from long fibres of one form or anoth­er, there is a ten­den­cy for paper machines to draw these fibres in to the machine in a par­tic­u­lar direc­tion.  Nat­u­ral­ly paper­mak­ers look to avoid this but even in fine papers you’ll end up with long fibres run­ning in the same direc­tion as the paper machine runs.  This is the ​‘grain direc­tion’.  There’s no firm rule about which direc­tion the grain will run in any giv­en pack­age, but paper mer­chants tend to cut the paper so that the grain runs from top to bot­tom.  On larg­er sheets that you might buy direct­ly the grain could run in either direc­tion.

    There are two sim­ple tests to find grain direc­tion.  If you tear the paper once and again at right-angles, you’ll see that the tear looks dif­fer­ent: with the grain will leave a much clean­er tear; across the grain will leave a more messy tear.  Alter­na­tive­ly you can cut two sim­i­lar pieces of paper around 2″ x 6″ at right angles to each oth­er and put them togeth­er.  Hold­ing one end out you’ll find that one might flop and anoth­er seem more strong; if not one might be ​‘sup­port­ing’ the oth­er.  This ​‘sup­port­ing’ or stronger piece will have the grain run­ning down the length of the paper.

    Grain direc­tion will affect ten­sile strength; rigid­i­ty and sta­bil­i­ty.  The degree to which these affect us will depend on the spe­cif­ic paper and mak­er so there are no con­crete rules on how big a prob­lem this might be for you.

    Strength will be most impor­tant in some spe­cial­ist appli­ca­tions: bot­tle labels, for exam­ple, are applied left-to-right on the bot­tle and so are pulled from left-to-right by the labelling machine.  Because the paper will be strongest with the grain, it should be print­ed so that the grain runs from left-to-right.  Oth­er areas might include hole punched doc­u­ments that might be sub­ject to pulling from left-to-right.

    To pre­vent ​‘spring­ing’ when a book­let is opened; the grain should run par­al­lel with the spine.  Look out for this if you intend to print, say, an A5 book­let from A4 because the A4 is usu­al­ly sold with the grain run­ning from top-to-bot­tom.  Using this will lead to the fold­ed book­let spring­ing open.

    Rigid­i­ty is impor­tant where print­ed arti­cles have to be han­dled or stored upright.  Index cards, for exam­ple, need to be print­ed with the grain run­ning from top-to-bot­tom as this will mean the card is strongest in this direc­tion, and so avoid the cards flop­ping down or curl­ing slight­ly.  Clock­ing-in cards should be print­ed with the grain run­ning top to bot­tom to help with the han­dling of the cards.

    Final­ly, sta­bil­i­ty rests on the ten­den­cy of paper to take up water from its sur­round­ings.  When this hap­pens the paper swells across the grain because fibres have a ten­den­cy to expand in their width rather than length.  This is most impor­tant when doing very close reg­is­ter work or colour print­ing.  There may be a direc­tion where the reg­is­ter is less impor­tant.  One exam­ple would be ledger sheets where top-to-bot­tom reg­is­ter is less impor­tant than the need to get left-to-right columns cor­rect, for a change in these could lead to mis­tak­en use of the wrong col­umn.  In this case, if the tol­er­ances are very tight, con­sid­er­a­tion should be giv­en to have the grain run­ning left-to-right across the page so that any expan­sion in the fibres has an effect top-to-bot­tom rather than left-to-right.

    All of these con­sid­er­a­tions seem small in com­par­i­son with machin­ing or the ini­tial lay­out but it’s these small details that will make the final job look and feel bet­ter than one with­out con­sid­er­a­tion of the grain direc­tion.

  • Paper

    Paper

    Tra­di­tion­al­ly those of us who print let­ter­press on a small scale often used to beg or buy off­cuts from com­me­cial print­ers, few of whom went whol­ly litho until the 1970s. Since then papers for litho have become increas­ing­ly dif­fer­ent to those suit­able for let­ter­press. The lat­ter, essen­tial­ly soft, absorbent and spongy, allow type to sink in with­out exces­sive­ly dis­tort­ing the oth­er side of the sheet. This enables one to achieve a decent impres­sion from rather worn case type whose char­ac­ters are no longer of pre­cise­ly con­sis­tent height. Such papers are not suit­ed to mod­ern high-speed pho­tolith­o­g­ra­phy which demands hard non-absorbent sur­faces which require less ink and don’t shed fibres on con­tact with plate-damp­ing solu­tions.

    With unworn type, newish rollers and near per­fect dis­tri­b­u­tion of ink and pres­sure it is pos­si­ble to print kiss impres­sion (ie no per­ceiv­able inden­ta­tion) let­ter­press on such paper if it is smooth sur­faced, although the slight­est over-ink­ing will result in a splodgy edge to the print­ed let­ters. Such rel­a­tive­ly brit­tle papers, when giv­en a tex­tured or embossed sur­face and even those made to resem­ble a tra­di­tion­al laid paper, such as the mod­ern ver­sion of Con­queror are, though, total­ly unsuit­ed to let­ter­press and will quick­ly wear out ones type rather than accept a decent impres­sion. Many cur­rent ​‘pres­tige’ brand­ed papers do not resem­ble in sub­stance or char­ac­ter those pro­duced under the same name thir­ty or more years ago: beware!

    The days when one could find paper suit­able for let­ter­press in a sta­tion­er’s shop are long gone.

    For let­ter­press, choose paper with a soft, silky sur­face and a resilient core which allows type to bite with­out over­ly emboss­ing the oth­er side.

    You don’t have to splurge on hand-made paper — mould-made paper, made on a slow­ly rotat­ing wire-mesh drum is more con­sis­tent and there­fore eas­i­er to print. Often made of sim­i­lar raw mate­ri­als, it is more afford­able whilst gen­er­al­ly of neu­tral ph and thus regard­ed as archival­ly per­ma­nent and will cer­tain­ly out­last most mod­ern mass-pro­duced papers. Cer­tain machine-made papers made on a wire-mesh con­vey­or belt, are of equal per­ma­nence and still less expen­sive. But avoid all hard, shiny, arti­fi­cial­ly tex­tured stock.

    Most machine or mould-made paper has a def­i­nite grain direc­tion; along the grain it is stiffer but eas­i­er to tear, across the grain it will more read­i­ly curl but is hard­er to tear. Book pages should have the grain ver­ti­cal so that they open and lie prop­er­ly, thus for a book project you need short-grain A4, which fold­ed will give long-grain A5 pages. A ream of A4 will be enough for more than 200 eight-page pam­phlets with an allowance for wastage.

    Think in terms of 100 to 160 gsm-or thick­er if you wish. Con­sid­er hav­ing a larg­er sheet cut down to approx­i­mate­ly A4 size and using the off­cuts for future projects.

    Take the advice of a knowl­edge­able spe­cial­ist paper mer­chant. Spe­cial­ist paper-mer­chants, who will advise on and sup­ply suit­able paper in small sizes and quan­ti­ties include-

    • Paper Resources Ltd., (Peter Gilbert and Simon Gilling­ham) Low­er Mill House, Mil­ton Road, Ship­ton Under Wych­wood, OX7 6XU (tele­phone 01933 276 689)
    • John Pur­cell Paper, 15, Rum­sey Road, Lon­don SW9 0TR (tele­phone 0207 737 5199) John Pur­cel­l’s cat­a­logue indi­cates the suit­abil­i­ty of each list­ed paper and includes an excel­lent four page arti­cle out­lin­ing the char­ac­ter­is­tics of all the class­es of paper one is like­ly to wish to use.

    This guide kind­ly con­tributed by John R Smith of the Old Forge Press. Orig­i­nal­ly appeared in the newslet­ter of the Oxford Guild of Print­ers